Downloads

Qi, G., Zhu, Z., Li, K., & Xiao, H. Advancements and Challenges in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey. Sensors and AI. 2025. doi: Retrieved from https://www.sciltp.com/journals/sai/article/view/658
Volume 1, Issue 1, 2025
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Review

Advancements and Challenges in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey

Guanqiu Qi 1,∗ , Zhiqin Zhu 2 , Ke Li 3 and Han Xiao 3

1 Computer Information Systems Department, State University of New York at Buffalo State, Buffalo, NY 14222, USA

2 College of Automation, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China

3 College of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China

* Correspondence: qig@buffalostate.edu

Received: 16 December 2024; Revised: 17 February 2025; Accepted: 18 February 2025; Published: 11 March 2025

Abstract: Medical image segmentation is a fundamental task in the field of medical imaging, enabling the accurate identification and delineation of structures such as organs, tissues, and lesions within medical images. These segmented regions are essential for diagnostic purposes, treatment planning, and disease monitoring. Over the years, medical image segmentation has evolved significantly, driven by advances in imaging technologies and computational techniques. Traditional methods, such as thresholding, region-growing, and active contours, have been supplemented and, in some cases, replaced by more sophisticated machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and their variants, including U-Net and Transformer-based models, have shown remarkable success in automating and improving segmentation tasks. This survey paper provides a comprehensive review of the various segmentation techniques, categorizing them into classical and deep learning-based methods. It discusses the strengths, limitations, and challenges of each approach, including issues related to data quality, class imbalance, and the generalizability of models. Furthermore, the paper highlights recent advancements in the field, emerging trends, and future directions for further enhancing segmentation accuracy, robustness, and efficiency in clinical applications. This work aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians looking to understand the current state of medical image segmentation and its potential future developments.

Keywords:

medical image segmentation encoding-decoding deep learning machine learning convolutional neural networks multi-modality

References

  1. Patrascanu, O.S.; Tutunaru, D.; Musat, C.L.; et al. Future Horizons: The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 656.
  2. Xu, Y.; Yu, K.; Qi, G.; et al. Brain tumour segmentation framework with deep nuanced reasoning and Swin-T. IET Image Process. 2024, 18, 1550–1564.
  3. Wahid, F.; Ma, Y.; Khan, D.; et al. Biomedical Image Segmentation: A Systematic Literature Review of Deep Learning Based Object Detection Methods. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.03393.
  4. Krikid, F.; Rositi, H.; Vacavant, A. State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods for Microscopic Image Segmentation: Applications to Cells, Nuclei, and Tissues. J. Imaging 2024, 10, 311.
  5. Zhu, Z.; Yin, H.; Chai, Y.; et al. A novel multi-modality image fusion method based on image decomposition and sparse representation. Inf. Sci. 2018, 432, 516–529.
  6. Zhu, Z.; Zheng, M.; Qi, G.; et al. A Phase Congruency and Local Laplacian Energy Based Multi-Modality Medical Image Fusion Method in NSCT Domain. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 20811–20824.
  7. Wang, K.; Zheng, M.; Wei, H.; et al. Multi-Modality Medical Image Fusion Using Convolutional Neural Network and Contrast Pyramid. Sensors 2020, 20, 2169.
  8. Gudigar, A.; Kadri, N.A.; Raghavendra, U.; et al. Automatic identification of hypertension and assessment of its secondary effects using artificial intelligence: A systematic review (2013–2023). Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 172, 108207.
  9. Rahmim, A.; Bradshaw, T.J.; Davidzon, G.; et al. Nuclear Medicine Artificial Intelligence in Action: The Bethesda Report (AI Summit 2024). arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.01044.
  10. Hussain, S.I.; Toscano, E. An extensive investigation into the use of machine learning tools and deep neural networks for the recognition of skin cancer: Challenges, future directions, and a comprehensive review. Symmetry 2024, 16, 366.
  11. Khandakar, S.; Al Mamun, M.A.; Islam, M.M.; et al. Unveiling Early Detection And Prevention Of Cancer: Machine Learning And Deep Learning Approaches. Educ. Adm. Theory Pract. 2024, 30, 14614–14628.
  12. Sobur, A.; Rana, I.C. Advancing Cancer Classification with Hybrid Deep Learning: Image Analysis for Lung and Colon Cancer Detection. SSRN 2024.
  13. Zhu, Z.; Sun, M.; Qi, G.; et al. Sparse Dynamic Volume TransUNet with multi-level edge fusion for brain tumor segmentation. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 172, 108284.
  14. Kong, Y.; Dun, Y.; Meng, J.; et al. A novel classification method of medical image segmentation algorithm. In Proceedings of the Medical Imaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Proceeding of 2020 International Conference on Medical Imaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis (MICAD 2020), Oxford, UK, 20–21 January 2020; pp. 107–115.
  15. Lin, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Optimal evolution algorithm for image thresholding. J. Comput. -Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 2010, 22, 1201–1206.
  16. Jianfeng, L. Adaptive region growing algorithm in medical images segmentation. J. Comput. Aided Des. Comput. Graph. 2005, 17, 2168.
  17. Cai, H.; Xu, X.; Lu, J.; et al. Repulsive force based snake model to segment and track neuronal axons in 3D microscopy image stacks. NeuroImage 2006, 32, 1608–1620.
  18. Sengur, A.; Guo, Y. Color texture image segmentation based on neutrosophic set and wavelet transformation. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 2011, 115, 1134–1144.
  19. Patil, D.D.; Deore, S.G. Medical image segmentation: A review. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 2013, 2, 22–27.
  20. Guerrout, E.H.; Mahiou, R.; Ait-Aoudia, S. Medical image segmentation on a cluster of PCs using Markov random fields. Int. J. New Comput. Archit. Their Appl. 2013, 3, 35–44.
  21. Cui, W.; Wang, Y.; Lei, T.; et al. Local region statistics-based active contour model for medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2013 Seventh International Conference on Image and Graphics, Qingdao, China, 26–28 July 2013; pp. 205–210.
  22. Li, B.N.; Chui, C.K.; Chang, S.; et al. Integrating spatial fuzzy clustering with level set methods for automated medical image segmentation. Comput. Biol. Med. 2011, 41, 1–10.
  23. Saha, P.K.; Udupa, J.K.; Odhner, D. Scale-based fuzzy connected image segmentation: Theory, algorithms, and validation. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 2000, 77, 145–174.
  24. Simonyan, K.; Vedaldi, A.; Zisserman, A. Deep fisher networks for large-scale image classification. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2013, 2013, 26.
  25. Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Ouyang, W.; et al. Learnable histogram: Statistical context features for deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11–14 October 2016.
  26. Zhu, L.; Ji, D.; Zhu, S.; et al. Learning statistical texture for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA, 20–25 June 2021; pp. 12537–12546.
  27. Long, J.; Shelhamer, E.; Darrell, T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA, 7–12 June 2015; pp. 3431–3440.
  28. Ronneberger, O.; Fischer, P.; Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, 5–9 October 2015.
  29. Zhou, Z.; Rahman Siddiquee, M.M.; Tajbakhsh, N.; et al. Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support 2018, Granada, Spain, 20 September 2018.
  30. Xiao, X.; Lian, S.; Luo, Z.; et al. Weighted res-unet for high-quality retina vessel segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 9th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), Hangzhou, China, 19–21 October 2018; pp. 327–331.
  31. Li, X.; Chen, H.; Qi, X.; et al. H-DenseUNet: Hybrid densely connected UNet for liver and tumor segmentation from CT volumes. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2018, 37, 2663–2674.
  32. Jin, Q.; Meng, Z.; Sun, C.; et al. RA-UNet: A hybrid deep attention-aware network to extract liver and tumor in CT scans. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 605132.
  33. Oktay, O.; Schlemper, J.; Folgoc, L.L.; et al. Attention u-net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1804.03999.
  34. C¸ ic¸ek, O.; Abdulkadir, A.; Lienkamp, S.S.; et al. 3D U-Net: Learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse ¨annotation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2016: 19th International Conference, Athens, Greece, 17–21 October 2016.
  35. Liu, Z.; Lin, Y.; Cao, Y.; et al. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada, 11–17 October 2021; pp. 10012–10022.
  36. Dosovitskiy, A. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.11929.
  37. Li, H.; Su, D.; Cai, Q.; et al. BSAFusion: A Bidirectional Stepwise Feature Alignment Network for Unaligned Medical Image Fusion. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.08050.
  38. Valanarasu, J.M.J.; Oza, P.; Hacihaliloglu, I.; et al. Medical transformer: Gated axial-attention for medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, 27 September–1 October 2021.
  39. Guo, J.; Han, K.; Wu, H.; et al. Cmt: Convolutional neural networks meet vision transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 18–24 June 2022; pp. 12175–12185.
  40. Dai, Z.; Liu, H.; Le, Q.V.; et al. Coatnet: Marrying convolution and attention for all data sizes. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2021, 34, 3965–3977.
  41. Zheng, S.; Lu, J.; Zhao, H.; et al. Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to-sequence perspective with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA, 19–25 June 2021; pp. 6881–6890.
  42. Chen, J.; Lu, Y.; Yu, Q.; et al. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.04306.
  43. Wenxuan, W.; Chen, C.; Meng, D.; et al. Transbts: Multimodal brain tumor segmentation using transformer. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Strasbourg, France, 27 September–1 October 2021; pp. 109–119.
  44. Jimenez-del Toro, O.; Muller, H.; Krenn, M.; et al. Cloud-based evaluation of anatomical structure segmentation and ¨ landmark detection algorithms: VISCERAL anatomy benchmarks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2016, 35, 2459–2475.
  45. Chang, V. Cloud Computing for brain segmentation technology. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Bristol, UK, 2–5 December 2013; Volume 1, pp. 499–504.
  46. Egger, J.; Wild, D.; Weber, M.; et al. Studierfenster: An open science cloud-based medical imaging analysis platform. J. Digit. Imaging 2022, 35, 340–355.
  47. Shaukat, Z.; Farooq, Q.u.A.; Tu, S.; et al. A state-of-the-art technique to perform cloud-based semantic segmentation using deep learning 3D U-Net architecture. BMC Bioinform. 2022, 23, 251.
  48. Howard, A.G. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1704.04861.
  49. Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G.E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2012, 2012, 25.
  50. Koonce, B.; Koonce, B.E. Convolutional Neural Networks with Swift for Tensorflow: Image Recognition and Dataset Categorization; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021.
  51. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; et al. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, California, USA, 4–9 December 2017; pp. 6000–6010.
  52. Mehta, S.; Rastegari, M. Mobilevit: Light-weight, general-purpose, and mobile-friendly vision transformer. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.02178.
  53. Dai, Y.; Zheng, T.; Xue, C.; et al. SegMarsViT: Lightweight mars terrain segmentation network for autonomous driving in planetary exploration. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 6297.
  54. Menze, B.H.; Van Leemput, K.; Lashkari, D.; et al. A generative model for brain tumor segmentation in multi-modal images. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2010: 13th International Conference, Beijing, China, 20–24 September 2010.
  55. Heinrich, M.P.; Maier, O.; Handels, H. Multi-modal Multi-Atlas Segmentation using Discrete Optimisation and Self-Similarities. Visc. Chall. 2015, 1390, 27.
  56. Havaei, M.; Davy, A.; Warde-Farley, D.; et al. Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks. Med. Image Anal. 2017, 35, 18–31.
  57. Goetz, M.; Weber, C.; Bloecher, J.; et al. Extremely randomized trees based brain tumor segmentation. Proceeding BRATS Chall. MICCAI 2014, 14, 24.
  58. Subbanna, N.K.; Precup, D.; Collins, D.L.; et al. Hierarchical probabilistic Gabor and MRF segmentation of brain tumours in MRI volumes. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2013:16th International Conference, Nagoya, Japan, 22–26 September 2013.
  59. Zikic, D.; Glocker, B.; Konukoglu, E.; et al. Decision forests for tissue-specific segmentation of high-grade gliomas in multi-channel MR. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2012:15th International Conference, Nice, France, 1–5 October 2012.
  60. Wu, W.; Chen, A.Y.; Zhao, L.; et al. Brain tumor detection and segmentation in a CRF (conditional random fields) framework with pixel-pairwise affinity and superpixel-level features. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 2014, 9, 241–253.
  61. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yin, L.; et al. X-net: A dual encoding–decoding method in medical image segmentation. Vis. Comput. 2023, 39, 2223–2233.
  62. Zhou, X.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Z.; et al. Boosted local dimensional mutation and all-dimensional neighborhood slime mould algorithm for feature selection. Neurocomputing 2023, 551, 126467.
  63. Shi, B.; Chen, J.; Chen, H.; et al. Prediction of recurrent spontaneous abortion using evolutionary machine learning with joint self-adaptive sime mould algorithm. Comput. Biol. Med. 2022, 148, 105885.
  64. Kamnitsas, K.; Ledig, C.; Newcombe, V.F.; et al. Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 2017, 36, 61–78.
  65. Zhou, Z.; Siddiquee, M.M.R.; Tajbakhsh, N.; et al. Unet++: Redesigning skip connections to exploit multiscale features in image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2019, 39, 1856–1867.
  66. Zhang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y. Road extraction by deep residual u-net. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2018, 15, 749–753.
  67. Myronenko, A. 3D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization. In Proceedings of the Brainlesion 2018: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Granada, Spain, 16 September 2018.
  68. Liu, Y.; Mu, F.; Shi, Y.; et al. Sf-net: A multi-task model for brain tumor segmentation in multimodal mri via image fusion. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 2022, 29, 1799–1803.
  69. Isensee, F.; Jaeger, P.F.; Kohl, S.A.; et al. nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 203–211.
  70. Roth, H.R.; Oda, H.; Zhou, X.; et al. An application of cascaded 3D fully convolutional networks for medical image segmentation. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2018, 66, 90–99.
  71. Wang, F.; Jiang, R.; Zheng, L.; et al. 3d u-net based brain tumor segmentation and survival days prediction. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 131–141.
  72. Liu, Z.; Tong, L.; Chen, L.; et al. Canet: Context aware network for brain glioma segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2021, 40, 1763–1777.
  73. Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, G.; et al. A dual-branch network for ultrasound image segmentation. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2025, 103, 107368.
  74. Shi, W.; Xu, J.; Gao, P. Ssformer: A lightweight transformer for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 24th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), Shanghai, China, 26–28 September 2022.
  75. Hatamizadeh, A.; Tang, Y.; Nath, V.; et al. Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3–8 January 2022; pp. 574–584.
  76. Zhou, H.Y.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. nnformer: Interleaved transformer for volumetric segmentation. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2109.03201.
  77. Hatamizadeh, A.; Nath, V.; Tang, Y.; et al. Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in mri images. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 272–284.
  78. Peiris, H.; Hayat, M.; Chen, Z.; et al. A robust volumetric transformer for accurate 3D tumor segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 162–172.
  79. Lee, S.H.; Lee, S.; Song, B.C. Vision transformer for small-size datasets. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2112.13492.
  80. Chandrakar, M.K.; Mishra, A. Brain tumor detection using multipath convolution neural network (CNN). Int. J. Comput. Vis. Image Process. 2020, 10, 43–53.
  81. Zhao, J.; Li, Q.; Li, X.; et al. Automated segmentation of cervical nuclei in pap smear images using deformable multi-path ensemble model. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019), Venice, Italy, 8–11 April 2019; pp. 1514–1518.
  82. Wang, N.; Lin, S.; Li, X.; et al. MISSU: 3D medical image segmentation via self-distilling TransUNet. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2023, 42, 2740–2750.
  83. Zhang, Y.; Bai, Z.; You, Y.; et al. Multi-path Feature Fusion and Channel Feature Pyramid for Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI. In International Conference on Image and Graphics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2023; pp. 26–36.
  84. Zhou, Z.; He, Z.; Jia, Y. AFPNet: A 3D fully convolutional neural network with atrous-convolution feature pyramid for brain tumor segmentation via MRI images. Neurocomputing 2020, 402, 235–244.
  85. Li, Y.; Cui, W.G.; Huang, H.; et al. Epileptic seizure detection in EEG signals using sparse multiscale radial basis function networks and the Fisher vector approach. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2019, 164, 96–106.
  86. Wang, G.; Li, W.; Ourselin, S.; et al. Automatic brain tumor segmentation using cascaded anisotropic convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the Brainlesion 2017: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 14 September 2017.
  87. Isensee, F.; Kickingereder, P.; Wick, W.; et al. No new-net. In Proceedings of the Brainlesion 2018: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Granada, Spain, 16 September 2018.
  88. Jiang, Z.; Ding, C.; Liu, M.; et al. Two-stage cascaded u-net: 1st place solution to brats challenge 2019 segmentation task. In Proceedings of the Brainlesion 2019: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Shenzhen, China, 17 October 2019.
  89. Pereira, S.; Pinto, A.; Alves, V.; et al. Brain tumor segmentation using convolutional neural networks in MRI images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2016, 35, 1240–1251.
  90. Dolz, J.; Gopinath, K.; Yuan, J.; et al. HyperDense-Net: A hyper-densely connected CNN for multi-modal image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2018, 38, 1116–1126.
  91. Liu, Y.; Mu, F.; Shi, Y.; et al. Brain tumor segmentation in multimodal MRI via pixel-level and feature-level image fusion. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 1000587.
  92. Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Tian, J.; et al. Modality-aware mutual learning for multi-modal medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, 27 September–1 October 2021.
  93. Mo, S.; Cai, M.; Lin, L.; et al. Multimodal priors guided segmentation of liver lesions in MRI using mutual information based graph co-attention networks. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, 4–8 October 2020.
  94. Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, H.; et al. Prototype-Driven and Multi-Expert Integrated Multi-Modal MR Brain Tumor Image Segmentation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2024, 74, 2500614.
  95. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; et al. Deformation-aware and reconstruction-driven multimodal representation learning for brain tumor segmentation with missing modalities. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2024, 91, 106012.
  96. Jegou, S.; Drozdzal, M.; Vazquez, D.; et al. The one hundred layers tiramisu: Fully convolutional densenets for semantic ´segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017; pp. 11–19.
  97. Gu, Z.; Cheng, J.; Fu, H.; et al. Ce-net: Context encoder network for 2d medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2019, 38, 2281–2292.
  98. Lee, H.J.; Kim, J.U.; Lee, S.; et al. Structure boundary preserving segmentation for medical image with ambiguous boundary. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA, 14–19 June 2020; pp. 4817–4826.
  99. Yan, Q.; Liu, S.; Xu, S.; et al. 3D Medical image segmentation using parallel transformers. Pattern Recognit. 2023, 138, 109432.
  100. Milletari, F.; Navab, N.; Ahmadi, S.A. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), Stanford, CA, USA, 25–28 October 2016; pp. 565–571.
  101. He, X.; Qi, G.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Medical image segmentation method based on multi-feature interaction and fusion over cloud computing. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2023, 126, 102769.
  102. Baid, U.; Ghodasara, S.; Mohan, S.; et al. The rsna-asnr-miccai brats 2021 benchmark on brain tumor segmentation and radiogenomic classification. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2107.02314.
  103. Xu, Y.; He, X.; Xu, G.; et al. A medical image segmentation method based on multi-dimensional statistical features. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 1009581.
  104. Vijay, S.; Guhan, T.; Srinivasan, K.; et al. MRI brain tumor segmentation using residual Spatial Pyramid Pooling-powered 3D U-Net. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1091850.
  105. Kamnitsas, K.; Bai, W.; Ferrante, E.; et al. Ensembles of multiple models and architectures for robust brain tumour segmentation. In Proceedings of the Brainlesion 2017: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 14 September 2017.
  106. Kamnitsas, K.; Ferrante, E.; Parisot, S.; et al. DeepMedic for brain tumor segmentation. In Proceedings of the Brainlesion 2016: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Athens, Greece, 17 October 2016.
  107. Isensee, F.; Jager, P.F.; Full, P.M.; et al. nnU-Net for brain tumor segmentation. In Proceedings of the Brainlesion 2020: ¨Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Lima, Peru, 4 October 2020.
  108. Luu, H.M.; Park, S.H. Extending nn-UNet for brain tumor segmentation. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 173–186.
  109. Wu, J.; Fu, R.; Fang, H.; et al. Medsegdiff: Medical image segmentation with diffusion probabilistic model. Med. Imaging Deep. Learn. PMLR 2024, 227, 1623–1639.
  110. Lin, J.; Lin, J.; Lu, C.; et al. CKD-TransBTS: Clinical knowledge-driven hybrid transformer with modality-correlated cross-attention for brain tumor segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2023, 42, 2451–2461.
  111. Zhu, Z.; He, X.; Qi, G.; et al. Brain tumor segmentation based on the fusion of deep semantics and edge information in multimodal MRI. Inf. Fusion 2023, 91, 376–387.
  112. Menze, B.H.; Jakab, A.; Bauer, S.; et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2014, 34, 1993–2024.
  113. Bakas, S.; Akbari, H.; Sotiras, A.; et al. Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci. Data 2017, 4, 1–13.
  114. Bakas, S.; Reyes, M.; Jakab, A.; et al. Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1811.02629.
  115. Kinga, D.; Adam, J.B. A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA, 7–9 May 2015; Volume 5, p. 6.
  116. Ho, N.V.; Nguyen, T.; Diep, G.H.; et al. Point-unet: A context-aware point-based neural network for volumetric segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, 27 September–1 October 2021.
  117. Jia, H.; Xia, Y.; Cai, W.; et al. Learning high-resolution and efficient non-local features for brain glioma segmentation in MR images. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, 4–8 October 2020.
  118. Zhang, D.; Huang, G.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Exploring task structure for brain tumor segmentation from multi-modality MR images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020, 29, 9032–9043.
  119. Zhou, T.; Ruan, S.; Guo, Y.; et al. A multi-modality fusion network based on attention mechanism for brain tumor segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Iowa City, Iowa, USA, 3–7 April 2020; pp. 377–380.
  120. Ding, Y.; Yu, X.; Yang, Y. RFNet: Region-aware fusion network for incomplete multi-modal brain tumor segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada, 11–17 October 2021; pp. 3975–3984.
  121. Zhu, Z.; Yu, K.; Qi, G.; et al. Lightweight medical image segmentation network with multi-scale feature-guided fusion. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 182, 109204.
  122. Gessert, N.; Sentker, T.; Madesta, F.; et al. Skin lesion classification using CNNs with patch-based attention and diagnosis-guided loss weighting. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2019, 67, 495–503.
  123. Codella, N.; Rotemberg, V.; Tschandl, P.; et al. Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection 2018: A challenge hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (isic). arXiv 2019, arXiv:1902.03368.
  124. Singh, V.K.; Kalafi, E.Y.; Wang, S.; et al. Prior wavelet knowledge for multi-modal medical image segmentation using a lightweight neural network with attention guided features. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 209, 118166.
  125. Sun, Y.; Dai, D.; Zhang, Q.; et al. MSCA-Net: Multi-scale contextual attention network for skin lesion segmentation. Pattern Recognit. 2023, 139, 109524.
  126. Wu, H.; Chen, S.; Chen, G.; et al. FAT-Net: Feature adaptive transformers for automated skin lesion segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 2022, 76, 102327.
  127. Zhu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Qi, G.; et al. Brain tumor segmentation in MRI with multi-modality spatial information enhancement and boundary shape correction. Pattern Recognit. 2024, 153, 110553.
  128. Qiu, S.; Li, C.; Feng, Y.; et al. GFANet: Gated fusion attention network for skin lesion segmentation. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023, 155, 106462.
  129. Zhao, C.; Lv, W.; Zhang, X.; et al. Mms-net: Multi-level multi-scale feature extraction network for medical image segmentation. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2023, 86, 105330.
  130. Wang, J.; Huang, G.; Zhong, G.; et al. Qgd-net: A lightweight model utilizing pixels of affinity in feature layer for dermoscopic lesion segmentation. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2023, 27, 5982–5993.
  131. Yu, Z.; Yu, L.; Zheng, W.; et al. EIU-Net: Enhanced feature extraction and improved skip connections in U-Net for skin lesion segmentation. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023, 162, 107081.
  132. Iqbal, A.; Sharif, M.; Khan, M.A.; et al. FF-UNet: A U-shaped deep convolutional neural network for multimodal biomedical image segmentation. Cogn. Comput. 2022, 14, 1287–1302.
  133. Valanarasu, J.M.J.; Patel, V.M. Unext: Mlp-based rapid medical image segmentation network. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 23–33.
  134. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Ouyang, L.; et al. SMTF: Sparse transformer with multiscale contextual fusion for medical image segmentation. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2024, 87, 105458.
  135. Song, E.; Zhan, B.; Liu, H. Combining external-latent attention for medical image segmentation. Neural Netw. 2024, 170, 468–477.
  136. Bernal, J.; Sanchez, F.J.; Fern ´ andez-Esparrach, G.; Gil, D.; et al. WM-DOVA maps for accurate polyp highlighting in ´colonoscopy: Validation vs. saliency maps from physicians. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2015, 43, 99–111.
  137. Jha, D.; Smedsrud, P.H.; Riegler, M.A.; et al. Kvasir-seg: A segmented polyp dataset. In Proceedings of the MultiMedia Modeling: 26th International Conference, MMM 2020, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 5–8 January 2020.
  138. Fan, D.P.; Ji, G.P.; Zhou, T.; et al. Pranet: Parallel reverse attention network for polyp segmentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Lima, Peru, 4–8 October 2020; pp. 263–273.
  139. Caicedo, J.C.; Goodman, A.; Karhohs, K.W.; et al. Nucleus segmentation across imaging experiments: The 2018 Data Science Bowl. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 1247–1253.
  140. Han, Z.; Jian, M.; Wang, G.G. ConvUNeXt: An efficient convolution neural network for medical image segmentation. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2022, 253, 109512.
  141. Chen, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Transattunet: Multi-level attention-guided u-net with transformer for medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2023, 8, 55–68.
  142. Zhao, X.; Zhang, L.; Lu, H. Automatic polyp segmentation via multi-scale subtraction network. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, 27 September–1 October 2021.
  143. Dong, B.; Wang, W.; Fan, D.P.; et al. Polyp-pvt: Polyp segmentation with pyramid vision transformers. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2108.06932.
  144. Bui, N.T.; Hoang, D.H.; Nguyen, Q.T.; et al. Meganet: Multi-scale edge-guided attention network for weak boundary polyp segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3–8 January 2024; pp. 7985–7994.